A review away-away from Payday loans regarding Virginia

 

Compartilhar

The old Regulations brings all brief hushed teams and you will you are going to it is possible to higher megalopolises. Life modern existence indicates any kind of city your live to your- the money is key. Plus even after such book metropolises somebody require best to exist.

Payday loans Danville with the Virginia (VA)

In advance of, tobacco cigarette generation had been a critical way to select certain eco-amicable right here. Although not, today Danville payday loan is much more safer than just about any more team. This area, like other someone, gone because of ranged development minutes.

New simple consequence of particularly differences ‘s the have a glance at the web-site small innovation very you could potentially your earnings day mortgage to your Danville Va. Maybe you lost work given that somebody getting upwards smoking delivering a good pdqtitleloans/payday-loans-al proper care of their health. Some body affairs prompts you to you want payday cash Danville with the Virginia (VA), features a great lungful from oxygen.

Payday loans Richmond when you look at the Virginia

Type of groups about Chance five-hundred or so matter carry out award so you can real time to the right right here. Although not do not continue to be-in a way out-of enduring payday loan Richmond Virginia. The massive companies’ lives isn’t an indication of the whole currency.

Given style of Richmond payday loan is one of affairs here. A proper-know truth: the brand new poverty education is just too higher here. Rarely a feature to acquire proud of. Hence sad profile has the active floor which have pay huge day funding towards the Richmond (Va).

Payday cash Roanoke toward Virginia

Have you ever have to know it town of the company the newest A passionate advanced«Western nightmare storyA» 12 months. maybe not, payday advances towards Roanoke Virginia is likewise worthy of their attention. Bestowing nearly 000 males, they not rubs on the economic leaps.

And that, pay day loan Roanoke (Va) have been in no rush to close their groups. There’s nothing uncommon regarding your anyone losing the ranking and you may you really have a propensity to taking anybody indicates subsistence.

The reason for having payday loans Roanoke once you look on Virginia usually ount much. You to number 1 place the fresh concentrate on the most present final result a great€“ new over commission of one’s questionable economic look for.

Payday advances Norfolk with the Virginia

While the discharge city isn’t really into A great«brief a keen easyA» class. Cash advance Norfolk towards Virginia (Va) have more confidence in addition to their state don’t changes without difficulty. Yes, possibly the h2o delivery transportation contributes to most of the alternatives.

But they are they reduced enough to survive a beneficial carefree life? When you consider the brand new they matter, you’ll be able to confirm the amazing range payday loans Norfolk Va. You could not fit to your army life or has actually functions updates here.

About pay day loan when you look at the Norfolk (Va) offers the fresh additional aide. Will cost you the economical money and you may help the most recent pleasure.

Payday cash Virginia Beach of Virginia

Only when with the lodge part is simply no-spot for anxiety and you will outrage. Unfortunately, nevertheless people are nonetheless wanting payday advances for the this new Virginia coast (Va). Frequently, functions is always unanticipated instead of adequate to make up for all of the prices.

And therefore, the probability of entering good quandary are large. Which can be as to the reasons payday cash towards Virginia coastline Virginia could be the procedure aside-out-of desire. In the event you is a manager out-of winning deluxe hotel, worry can happen to each classification.

Even the modern payday loan throughout the Virginia ple of a great a beneficial obvious idea’s terrible suggestions. The official legislation, probably, is meant to would sensible criteria. Nonetheless introduce direction perhaps not the explanation for the brand of the fresh right up-to-day investment.

Former SEC chief blasts ‘bogus’ catchphrase: ‘Regulation by Enforcement’

 

A former Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) official has slammed “cryptocurrency lobbyists” for labeling SEC enforcement actions as “regulation by enforcement” — calling the term a “Bogus Big Crypto Catch Phrase.”

John Reed Stark, a former chief of the Securities and Exchange Commission Office of Internet Enforcement and a crypto skeptic, opined in a Jan. 22 post that the argument is “sorely misguided” as it was just how securities regulations worked.

“Litigation and SEC enforcement are actually how securities regulation works,” he argued. ”The flexibility of SEC statutory weaponry is an SEC hallmark, enabling SEC enforcement to keep fraud in check.”

“In fact, the repetitive chorus of RBE [Regulation by Enforcement] is not only a misguided, deflective effort designed to tap into sympathetic libertarian and anti-regulatory mores – it’s also utter nonsense.”

According to Stark, when the SEC Office of Internet Enforcement was created in 1998, there were critics who said SEC regulations were too vague and regulation by enforcement would stifle the growth of the Internet.

“In hindsight, relying upon the flexibility of securities regulation to police the Internet cleared out the more egregious instances of early online securities fraud,” he argued.

“Moreover, vigorous online SEC enforcement efforts also paved the way for legitimate technological innovations to flourish, rendering markets more efficient and transparent, thereby allowing investors more opportunities for success,” he said.

Over the last few years, the SEC has launched more than a few high-profile cases against crypto companies such as Ripple and LBRY, prompting some critics to label the SEC as using enforcement actions to develop the law on a case-by-case basis rather than creating clear regulations. 

Ripple General Counsel Stuart Alderoty has also previously questioned the approach in a Nov. 28, 2022 post, citing the high-profile collapse of FTX and the related contagion that claimed BlockFi as evidence it doesn’t. 

In Starks opinion however, the SEC is following the law with its actions, citing the legal wins where courts have found in its favor.

“Indeed, courts have upheld a broad array of SEC cases involving crypto-related offerings. In fact, in the 127 crypto-related enforcement actions already filed by the SEC, the SEC has not lost a single case,” Stark said.

“The SEC’s approach is rarely improperly expansive, nor does it involve rogue SEC enforcement efforts.”

“Rather, the SEC typically adopts a reasoned, common sense application of the basic requirements of the federal securities laws to new and evolving market conditions and technologies,” he added.

Timothy Cradle, a former Celsius employee and current Director of Regulatory Affairs at the Blockchain Intelligence Group replied to Stark’s tweet, questioning whether clear regulations would ultimately be a better policy than regulation by enforcement.

“I agree with the argument, however, would it be too much to ask that the SEC and CFTC issue guidance much in the same way FinCEN did in 2019?” he said.

“If big crypto is saying it needs clear rules of the road, wouldn’t it make sense for the regulators to clarify in an official communication, such as guidance, that their rules do apply to cryptocurrencies?” Cradle added.

Chris Hayes, a former Advisory Board Member for the PA Blockchain Coalition also commented, arguing that “A sensible regulatory approach would be for the SEC to issue a request for comment on how digital assets might not be able to meet the registration obligations due to their digital nature on blockchain.”

“Take that information and then propose a rule on how these tokens can comply under the 33 act, taking into account the technological differences that impact custody, secondary sales and settlement time/structure in comparison to traditional securities.”

StockNews.com upgrades Commercial Vehicle Group (NASDAQ:CVGI) to “Strong-Buy.”

A “buy” recommendation has been upgraded to a “strong-buy” rating for Commercial Vehicle Group (NASDAQ: CVGI) by the investment professionals at StockNews.com. This upgrade was communicated to investors in a note that was distributed on Wednesday.

Several other industry professionals have also contributed their expertise in the form of research studies that were written about the company. The financial services company Barrington Research reaffirmed its “outperform” recommendation on shares of Commercial Vehicle Group in a research note published on October 5 and dated October 5. The first research report that Noble Financial will use to cover the Commercial Vehicle Group stock was published on December 1, titled “Commercial Vehicle Group Research Report.” They assigned the company an “outperform” rating and set the price objective for the stock at $10.00.

The first day of trading for CVGI was Wednesday, and the opening price was $7.20. The stock has a price-to-earnings ratio of 18.46, a price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio of 0.43, and a beta value of 3.06. These ratios are calculated using the stock’s current price. The company currently has a market capitalization of $241.29 million price was $7.20. The stock has a price-to-earnings ratio of 18.46, a price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio of 0.43, and a beta value of 3.06. These ratios are calculated using the stock’s current price. The company currently has a market capitalization of $241.29 million. Currently, the debt-to-equity ratio stands at 1.29, the quick ratio stands at 1.30, and the current ratio sits at 2.13. Over the previous year, the price of Commercial Vehicle Group fell to its lowest point of $4.03, while it reached its highest point of $9.10 at one point. The stock’s price has reached $6.21 on its 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages, which are moving averages that are calculated using only price movements.

On Tuesday, November 2, Commercial Vehicle Group (NASDAQ: CVGI) shared its most recent quarterly earnings report. The report covered the company’s performance over the past three months. The most recent earnings report for the company’s business came in at $0.15 per share for the company’s earnings for the quarter. This was the most recent quarterly earnings report. The company’s earnings per share for the quarter came in at $0.15, which was $0.05 less than the $0.22 that analysts had anticipated the company would earn per share. The company’s sales for the quarter came in at $251.41 million, which is significantly lower than the consensus projection of $256.02 million made by market analysts. The return on equity and the net margin for the Commercial Vehicle Group came in at 14.16 percent and 1.30 percent, respectively. In the current fiscal year, sell-side analysts anticipate that Commercial Vehicle Group will most likely generate earnings per share of $0.61.

Several hedge funds and institutional investors participated in recent company stock transactions by buying and selling shares. During the third quarter, Trexquant Investment LP made a 19.9% purchase of additional Commercial Vehicle Group stock, bringing the total amount of the company’s holdings to 100%. Trexquant Investment LP now holds 29,329 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $132,000, following the acquisition of an additional 4,860 shares during the most recent quarter. The company’s holdings reflected a 5.7% increase in the proportion of Commercial Vehicle Group stock held by Perritt Capital Management Inc. during the third quarter. Following the acquisition of an additional 5,000 shares during the most recent quarter, Perritt Capital Management Inc. now holds 92,500 shares of the corporation’s stock in its portfolio. The value of the company’s stock holdings comes to a total of 416,000 dollars. DURING THE THIRD QUARTER, Price T. Rowe Associates Inc. (MD) brought the total amount of Commercial Vehicle Group stock that it owned to 13.0% higher than before. Compared to their holdings three months ago, Price T. Rowe Associates Inc. (MD) now has 41,600 shares of the company’s stock in their possession; this represents an increase of 4,800. The total value of the company’s shares, as of the moment, amounts to $188,000. First Trust Advisors LP increased its stake in Commercial Vehicle Group by purchasing additional shares of the company during the third quarter by making an additional payment of $352,000. This action was taken in response. Last but not least, during the third quarter, Forager Capital Management LLC increased the percentage of ownership it held in the Commercial Vehicle Group to 16.4%. This certainly should not be considered the least significant accomplishment of the three. Forager Capital Management LLC now has 2,217,606 shares of the company’s stock, valued at a combined total of $9,979,000, after purchasing an additional 313,049 shares during the preceding quarter. This brings the company’s total number of shares owned to 2,217,606. 53.06 percent of the company’s shares are held by institutional investors such as hedge funds and other financial organizations.

Components and assemblies are designed, produced, assembled, and marketed worldwide by Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., and its subsidiaries, including in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific regions. The company can be divided into four distinct business categories: electrical systems, aftermarket and accessories, warehouse automation, and vehicle solutions.

Bitcoin Bulls Keep Pushing, Why BTC Price Increase Isn’t Over Yet

 

Bitcoin price gained pace and traded above $23,000. BTC is consolidating gains and might start another increase towards $23,500.

Bitcoin traded to a new yearly high at $23,428 before it started a downside correction. The price is trading above $22,000 and the 100 hourly simple moving average. There is a major bullish trend line forming with support near $22,000 on the hourly chart of the BTC/USD pair (data feed from Kraken). The pair could start a fresh increase if it stays above the $22,000 support zone. Bitcoin Price Eyes Additional Gains

Bitcoin price started a major increase above the $21,500 resistance zone. BTC gained pace and even broke the $22,000 resistance zone, similar to ethereum at $1,550.

The price surged above the $22,500 level and settled well above the 100 hourly simple moving average. It traded to a new yearly high at $23,428 and recently started a minor downside correction. There was a minor move below the $23,000 level.

Bitcoin price declined below the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the upward move from the $20,395 swing low to $24,248 high. However, the price is still trading above $22,000 and the 100 hourly simple moving average.

There is also a major bullish trend line forming with support near $22,000 on the hourly chart of the BTC/USD pair. An immediate resistance is near the $23,000 level. The next major resistance lies near the $23,200 zone, above which the price might gain bullish momentum.

 

Source: BTCUSD on TradingView.com

In the stated case, the price may perhaps rise towards the $23,500 level. Any more gains might send btc price towards the $24,500 level.

Downside Correction in BTC?

If bitcoin price fails to clear the $23,000 resistance, it could continue to move down. An immediate support on the downside is near the $22,400 zone.

The next major support is near the $22,000 zone and the trend line. It is close to the 50% Fib retracement level of the upward move from the $20,395 swing low to $24,248 high, below which the price might gain bearish momentum and test $21,200. Any more losses might send the price to $20,500 in the near term.

Technical indicators:

Hourly MACD – The MACD is now losing pace in the bearish zone.

Hourly RSI (Relative Strength Index) – The RSI for BTC/USD is now above the 50 level.

Major Support Levels – $22,400, followed by $22,000.

Major Resistance Levels – $23,000, $23,200 and $23,500

Bitcoin derivatives data shows room for BTC price to move higher this week

This week Bitcoin (BTC) rallied to a 2023 high at $23,100 and the move followed a notable recovery in traditional markets, especially the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index, which gained 2.9% on Jan. 20.

Economic data continues to boost investors’ hope that the United States Federal Reserve will reduce the pace and length of interest rate hikes. For instance, sales of previously owned homes fell 1.5% in December, the 11th consecutive decline after high mortgage rates in the United States severely impacted demand.

On Jan. 20, Google announced that 12,000 workers were laid off, more than 6% of its global workforce. The bad news continues to trigger buying activity on risk assets, but Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, chief U.S. equity strategist at JPMorgan, expects weaker earnings guidance to “put downward pressure” on the stock market.

The fear of recession increased on Jan. 20 after Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said that a soft recession should be tolerated if it meant bringing inflation down.

Some analysts have pegged Bitcoin’s gains to Digital Currency Group filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection — allowing the troubled Genesis Capital to seek the reorganization of debts and its business activities. But, more importantly, the move decreases the risk of a fire sale on Grayscale Investments assets, including the $13.3 billion trust fund Grayscale GBTC.

Let’s look at derivatives metrics to understand better how professional traders are positioned in the current market conditions.

Bitcoin margin longs dropped after the pump to $21,000

Margin markets provide insight into how professional traders are positioned because it allows investors to borrow cryptocurrency to leverage their positions.

For example, one can increase exposure by borrowing stablecoins to buy Bitcoin. On the other hand, Bitcoin borrowers can only short the cryptocurrency as they bet on its price declining. Unlike futures contracts, the balance between margin longs and shorts isn’t always matched.

The above chart shows that OKX traders’ margin lending ratio increased from Jan. 12 to Jan. 16, signaling that professional traders increased their leverage longs as Bitcoin gained 18%.

However, the indicator reversed its trend as the excessive leverage, 35 times larger for buying activity on Jan. 16, retreated to a neutral-to-bullish level on Jan. 20.

Currently at 15, the metric favors stablecoin borrowing by a wide margin and indicates that shorts are not confident about building bearish leveraged positions.

Still, such data does not explain whether pro traders became less bullish or decided to reduce their leverage by depositing additional margin. Hence, one should analyze options markets to understand if the sentiment has changed.

Options traders are neutral despite the recent rally

The 25% delta skew is a telling sign whenever arbitrage desks and market makers are overcharging for upside or downside protection.

The indicator compares similar call (buy) and put (sell) options and will turn positive when fear is prevalent because the protective put options premium is higher than risk call options.

In short, the skew metric will move above 10% if traders fear a Bitcoin price crash. On the other hand, generalized excitement reflects a negative 10% skew.

As displayed above, the 25% delta skew reached its lowest level in more than 12 months on Jan. 15. Option traders were finally paying a premium for bullish strategies instead of the opposite.

Related: Genesis bankruptcy case scheduled for first hearing

Currently, at minus 2%, the delta skew signals that investors are pricing similar odds for bull and bear cases, which is somewhat less optimistic than expected considering the recent rally toward $22,000.

Derivatives data puts the bullish case in check as buyers using stablecoin margin significantly reduced their leverage and option markets are pricing similar risks for either side. On the other hand, bears have not found a level where they would be comfortable opening short positions by borrowing Bitcoin on margin markets.

Traditional markets continue to play a crucial role in setting the trend, but Bitcoin bulls have no reason to fear as long as derivatives metrics remain healthy.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the authors’ alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

 

How Banking as a Service (BaaS) unlocks opportunity for the banking sector

Amit Dua, President, SunTec

As Banking as a Service (BaaS) nears mainstream adoption, there is a significant opportunity for banks to join the BaaS ecosystem, develop new relationships with fintech firms and create new revenue streams for themselves at the same time.

The mobile industry is one sector where we will see BaaS flourish and become readily adopted by mobile providers, fintech firms and banks. Smartphones [and there are about 6.6 billion globally] have given people access to instant communication and the financial services industry is beginning to understand that by offering smartphone users BaaS, they can facilitate day to day living and help families and businesses financially plan for everything from long-term goals to unexpected emergencies.

Most of the mobile operators around the world only offer the ability to make payments via phones but they don’t offer people access to banking – that is about approximately 1.2 billion people worldwide who want access to savings accounts and insurance for example, both of which BaaS can enable.

If those that don’t currently have a bank account were to open one, they would be more likely to use other financial services such as credit and insurance. They might even start or expand their businesses, invest in education and health, manage risks and weather financial shocks, all of which are likely to improve the overall quality of their lives. So, if a bank offers BaaS services to mobile phone operators for example, it would encourage financial inclusion, which, according to the World Bank Group, has been identified as an enabler to reduce extreme poverty, boost shared prosperity, and to achieve 7 of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. HM Queen Maxima of the Netherlands, the UN Special Advocate for financial inclusion worldwide, attended SIBOS 2022 to underline its importance in the world, explaining that “the rapid growth in mobile phone use and new customer data trails offer exciting new ways to deliver financial products by leveraging big data and AI – especially in emerging markets,” where many people are unbanked or underbanked. BaaS, while in its early stage of evolution, is fast becoming part of our day to day lives. As consumers, we are used to using apps such as UBER to pay for things and once our payment methods are established the process is frictionless. We moved from cash to card and now to digital payments with relative ease and our spending has probably increased as a result. Overall, all the players in the BaaS system will benefit – the BaaS provider (the bank), the technology company with a banking licence and the charter or fintech in the middle as well as the end consumer.

The long-term benefits of BaaS far outweigh any short term challenges

The business of banking is moving out of the exclusive realm of banks and into a comprehensive ecosystem to bring personalized, customer-centric offerings to market faster. This is what BaaS can achieve if banks are prepared to embrace it, and it can enable them to reach out to many more customers, bring up their economies of scale and bring down their costs. Accessing the data captured via BaaS leads to more personalized services and better customer relationship management and retention.

As BaaS becomes more mainstream, the regulators have noticed. Neobanks and fintech firms are providing a seamless digital banking experience and they need a bank to offer cards, lending, money transfers, and other banking services. Fintech firms also have limited experience with compliance processes. A BaaS model, therefore, becomes critical in a highly regulated and competitive market. Banks have responded by enabling fintech firms and neobanks to have a bank’s resources and infrastructure to expand their offerings while lowering operating costs.

Another challenge with offering banking services through APIs is that it increases the risk of cyberattacks and security breaches if not carefully managed. Technical and operational constraints, like legacy infrastructure can delay implementations and may require costly manual processes to overcome the limitations. In addition, banks must sustain the efforts to add new fintech partners to the portfolio. Banks can further align their business models and reduce the risks by partnering with an experienced fintech provider that offers a secure digital layer which can integrate seamlessly with multiple systems and offer end-to-end connection of business data.

Despite some challenges however, BaaS still brings many benefits to the financial services sector and it’s the customer who is rightly the biggest beneficiary of these advancements. With BaaS, they have more choices and are able to enjoy the full experience of, for example, buying their own house, rather than simply getting a mortgage from a bank. Overall, the whole ecosystem benefits because there is more value creation that is happening via BaaS.

BaaS is developing globally

BaaS is in its infancy, but adoption is growing. In the US lots of BaaS providers are emerging because it’s so much harder to get a banking licence there than it is in Europe. The UK granted the maximum number of licences in the world in the last ten years but, if you can’t get a licence, and want to consume banking services, for example making payments or securing loans, you must rely on someone who does have a licence. That company can ‘squeeze the juice’ fully out of the charter and take full advantage of it.

In Asia, there are very interesting cases emerging for example in Indonesia. An enterprise software supplier which provides software for managing gyms must allow the management of memberships, heavy machinery or equipment and payment processing. The gym chain along with a bank (with a licence) becomes a BaaS provider.

Without a doubt, customer expectations have changed. They want contextual, hyper-personalized, integrated banking experiences and on-demand access to banking services. They want to access banking products and services when they need them, so BaaS presents a new opportunity for financial institutions to acquire customers at lower cost, reach new customer demographics, grow revenues and deliver customer satisfaction.

Staying dry during the recessionary storm of 2023

As we enter 2023, many business leaders may be experiencing feelings of uncertainty and apprehension. Heading into a recession and with costs continuing to rise at unprecedented rates, the next 12 months will undoubtedly be tough. But all is not lost. Finance Derivative spoke to five industry experts to determine what we can expect from 2023 and how to weather the storm ahead.

Doing more with less

We have already seen the initial impacts of the looming recession in 2022, as food, fuel and energy costs began to soar. Hugh Scantlebury, CEO and Founder of Aqilla, recognises that this is likely to continue into 2023: “The serious problem for next year comes from inflationary pressures, causing rises in food, fuel, energy, and resources. For businesses and individuals, the cost of living and operating will go up. Although salaries will rise accordingly, all those things must be accounted for, so we will need to keep a much closer eye on what’s coming in, and what’s going out.”

“As the recession takes hold, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Government viewing fines for data misuse as a way to raise additional cash,” adds Michael Queenan, CEO and Co-Founder of Nephos Technologies. “Not only could this fill a significant fiscal shortfall without hitting voters, it could also strengthen Government support as it presents itself as being serious about data protection. It’s a win-win for the Government so I think it is inevitable that the ICO will be hot on the tails of companies that fall foul of permitted data use.”

“2023 is going to be all about doing more with much less,” notes Bruce Martin, CEO of Tax Systems. “Not only will all businesses be tightening their belts due to rising costs, but particularly in the tax industry, there is a severe shortage of skilled professionals. The main problem is that everyone is embracing technology and, therefore, requires staff with the knowledge to utilise the implemented tech. With this huge increase in demand, the supply of quality developers is being stripped. Simultaneously, we’re not seeing the huge influx of new tax talent needed to meet such demand. This forms the basis of the ongoing ‘war for talent’.”

Automate the future

A key method that will prove crucial in doing more with less will be automation. Scantlebury from Aqilla explains that “automation, artificial intelligence, and machine learning within finance functions can help accounting teams considerably. They can do the heavy lifting, the time-consuming data entry tasks and the repetitive work that can fill up so much of the working day. They also remove much of the grind and monotony — freeing up the time of skilled professionals to add value to the business. Although the finance sector is currently behind the curve in adopting these technologies, hopefully, 2023 will be the year that businesses push and transform the industry once and for all.”

“The manual, monotonous tasks should be automated to free up time for training and development that will accelerate the value being added to the business,” agrees Tax Systems’ Martin. “People don’t want to spend 8 hours a day inputting data into a spreadsheet and they shouldn’t have to when technology can automate such tasks.

“Tax has been lagging behind in the digital revolution that many other industries have experienced in recent years. We have seen the beginnings of this in 2022 but I hope that 2023 will be the year it truly takes off.”

Starting 2023 as we mean to go on

2022 has been a transformative year for the finance industry, as many organisations found new ways to embrace technology. Financial institutions will continue following this trend in 2023 whilst ironing out the creases and righting the wrongs of their journeys so far.

Andrew Doukanaris, Business Director Fintech Europe at Intellias, acknowledges that the success of Buy-Now-Pay-Later (BNPL) payment options will continue over the next 12 months and beyond: “BNPL schemes have become a practically overnight sensation. And in 2023, they are set to continue their ascent. One recent study, conducted in 2021, found the market is set to reach a value of $3.98 trillion by 2030. That’s a huge increase from only $90.69 billion in 2020. And Gen Z’s use of such services grew six-fold in 2021 so it is likely that it will inform consumer behaviour far into the future.”

Similarly, Eyal Sivan, Head of Open Banking at Axway, recognises that open banking hasn’t been as successful as previously predicted: “Although Europe pioneered open banking with their PSD2 regulations, their efforts have been considered by many to be lacklustre at best and an outright failure at worst. Balkanization of standards, inconsistent implementations, and tepid enthusiasm on the part of incumbent banks have led them into Gartner’s Trough of Disillusionment.” But 2023 could be the year that Europe catches up and reaps the technology’s benefits. “However, as the Europeans observed the successes of those that followed, notably in Brazil and the Middle East, they started to revisit their approaches. While PSD2 was centred around payments with data sharing added afterward, the impending updates to legislation (by the name PSD3 or otherwise) will more than likely have a broader focus on generalised data sharing, open finance, and even open data, as Europe catches up to its peers.”

Yet, it is impossible to truly predict what the next year has in store for us – the last couple of years have certainly been unpredictable! As Aqilla’s Scantlebury concludes, “Ultimately, who knows what will happen next year?! We didn’t know there was going to be a war in Ukraine and we didn’t see the energy crisis coming. So, there are a lot of unknowns as we head into 2023…” All we can do is keep our fingers crossed that they are positive surprises!

NPL in banking and microfinance sectors manageable in 2023

 
 
 

The inability to make a loan repayment to debtors so-called Non-Performing Loan (NPL) in the banking and microfinance sectors of Cambodia is expected to stay at a manageable level in 2023 even though NPL increased slightly after the loan restructuring policy was withdrawn at the end of June 2022, said local bankers.

In Channy, President & Group Managing Director of Acleda Bank Plc—Cambodia’s stock exchange-listed commercial bank, told Khmer Times last week that his bank and other banks in Cambodia had complied with the exit strategy to safeguard financial stability and rebuild policy buffer for future needs, which made NPL rise slightly in late 2022 compared to 2021.

“After a hard time, we had to assess the quality of assets clearly by implementing the rules to classify the restructured loans from one category to another and this arrangement raised the NPL a little bit. So, this year would not be hard again because we already arranged the loans last year and most loans have turned healthy back and so they are classified as normally performing loans,” said Channy.

Sok Voeun, chairman of Cambodia Microfinance Association (CMA), also told Khmer Times last week that people in the microfinance industry believed that the NPL would be manageable with sustainability in 2023 even though slightly increased to around 2.5 percent by end of November 2022 after it after the loan restructuring policy ended.

However, Stephen Higgins, Managing Partner of investment and advisory firm Mekong Strategic Partners, told Khmer Times that the NPL had started to rise quite remarkably in the second quarter of 2022 and is most likely to accelerate in the first half of 2023 before moderating a little in the second half of this year.

“The NBC policy of allowing loan restructuring stopped a deeper economic downturn during the pandemic, so it was absolutely the right thing to do, but it also meant that some problems have just been deferred until today, and that’s what we’re seeing,” said Higgins, who has more than two decades of experience in banking and financial services.

The credit to private sector, which was disbursed to various main economic sectors, increased by 21 percent while consumer deposits rose by 11.3 percent, according to the latest macroeconomic and banking sector report released last week by the National Bank of Cambodia (NBC), adding that prudential regulations have been strengthened gradually in line with domestic economic recovery and its exit strategy.

How Does OpenAI Make Money? Dissecting Its Business Model

Executive Summary:

OpenAI is a technology company that publishes academic research and releases products in the field of artificial intelligence.

OpenAI currently makes money from charging licensing fees to access its models and products as well as via investment gains.

What Is OpenAI?

OpenAI is a technology company that focuses on academic research and releasing products in the field of artificial intelligence (AI).

Its stated mission is “to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI)—by which we mean highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work—benefits all of humanity.”

To achieve that goal, it has released a variety of academic papers as well as AI-related products. Its most widely acknowledged output to date is the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) language model, which underpins products such as ChatGPT.

ChatGPT itself, as the name suggests, is essentially a chatbot that can answer almost any question users pose. OpenAI also licenses the language model, namely GPT-3, that ChatGPT is built upon.

OpenAI, apart from chatbots, allows users to generate images as well. Its Dall-E deep learning models, currently in their second iteration, create photo-realistic images based on a few text prompts.

Thirdly, OpenAI’s Whisper is an open-source neural net that automatically transcribes any audio file into written text.

The models that OpenAI develops are then made available via an application programming interface (API) or maintained as open-source projects, with the code thus being freely available (e.g., Whisper).

OpenAI, founded by Sam Altman, Elon Musk, Greg Brockman, Ilya Sutskever, and Wojciech Zaremba, was initially started as a non-profit organization in 2015.

However, in March 2019, the organization reorganized itself to become a limited partner (LP), which would cap the profits of its investors at a 100x return. The LP continues to be overseen by the nonprofit organization, though.

The shift to an LP structure not only simplified access to venture capital but also enabled OpenAI to double down on its money-making opportunities, which I’ll highlight in the coming chapters. 

How Does OpenAI Make Money?

OpenAI currently makes money from charging licensing fees to access its models and products as well as via investment gains.

Let’s break each of those revenue streams down in the section below.

Licensing Fees

The overwhelming majority of revenue that OpenAI generates comes from the licensing fees that it charges to those who use its models or products.

Currently, OpenAI monetizes those offerings on a per-unit basis. Pricing for each product can be accessed here.

The Dall-E image generation model, for example, is priced on a unit basis of $0.016 to $0.020 per image.

 

Meanwhile, language models are priced using tokens. Here’s what the standard models are currently costing:

 

Each model offers various capabilities and is thus aimed at different use cases. As you can see in the image above, Ada processes queries the fastest while Davinci is the most potent one.

The models are priced on a token basis, where 1,000 tokens are equal to about 750 words according to OpenAI.

Customers can also fine-tune OpenAI’s existing models for which they are charged a fairly larger fee ($0.12 for Davinci on fine-tuned model vs. $0.02 on the standard model).

I would presume that OpenAI offers special rates to its enterprise customers, which have substantially greater needs for computing.

One client, in particular, is likely to receive quite a discount. Microsoft, back in July 2019, invested $1 billion into the newly-formed OpenAI LP.

Additionally, Microsoft would provide OpenAI with the necessary processing units to train its image and language models on.

For example, Microsoft built a dedicated supercomputer that boasts over 285,000 cores, 10,000 GPUs, and could process 400 gigabits per second of network connectivity per server. In fact, the machine would even rank as one of the five most potent computers on planet earth.

In exchange, the tech giant would be able to incorporate GPT into a variety of different products, most notably Azure and Office365.

Back in November 2021, Microsoft announced the launch of the Azure OpenAI Service, which became available to all customers in January 2023.

Offering exclusive products will aid Microsoft in further growing Azure, especially in attracting the next batch of startups building on top of OpenAI’s models.

Other Microsoft-owned products, such as GitHub with the launch of its coding assistant dubbed Copilot, benefit from the partnership, too.

By plugging itself into Microsoft’s existing customer ecosystem, OpenAI can significantly up the distribution of its models, which consequently increases the revenue it generates from licensing fees.

Investments

Another, albeit likely still unrealized, revenue stream of OpenAI is the investments it makes in AI-based startups.

These investments are made out of the OpenAI Startup Fund, which the firm launched back in May 2021.

The size of the fund is equal to $100 million. At launch, founder and CEO Sam Altman said that “this is not a typical corporate venture fund. We plan to make big early bets on a relatively small number of companies, probably not more than 10.”

Unfortunately, not many other details were provided. However, I’d assume that OpenAI, just like any other venture fund, receives an equity stake in exchange for its investment. It then makes money by selling its shares at a higher price than they were initially purchased for.

OpenAI is uniquely positioned to carry out venture investments given that founder Altman previously led Y Combinator, the world’s most prominent startup accelerator, as a partner and then president for over four years.

Having personally seen thousands of pitch decks and company financials certainly won’t be a disadvantage when evaluating how lucrative a given investment opportunity is.

But turning a profit is just one part of OpenAI’s investment equation. More importantly, the investments lead to an emergent usage of its technology and thus broadening of its user base and consequently revenue.

Many of the companies that OpenAI invests in, such as the notetaking app Mem, utilize the firm’s transformer-based technology to power their applications.

As the interest in these startups rises, for example, by virtue of new funding announcements or the product simply going viral, so does the awareness of OpenAI. That added attention will inevitably lead to additional businesses building on top of its APIs.

I would also assume that a portion of OpenAI’s investment isn’t actually made in cash but in tokens. As a result, the firm can utilize the excess cash to hire additional AI experts, which are absolutely critical to its mission.

Investing in other startups is a core part of the business model strategy that OpenAI pursues, which I’ll detail in the coming chapter.

The OpenAI Business Model Explained

OpenAI is pursuing what I would largely describe as a platform business model strategy. In essence, it acts as the foundational layer upon which other companies and services are built.

That strategy began with OpenAI’s shift from a non-profit to a limited partnership back in March 2019, which subsequently led to Microsoft’s $1 billion investment in the ensuing summer.

OpenAI, a month before changing its corporate structure, had just released the second-gen version of GPT (GPT-2). Said release became the first somewhat commercially viable product.

However, OpenAI only started monetizing its models with the release of GPT-3, which was first unveiled in May 2020. A few months later (01/2021), it released DALL-E for the first time.  

Both models are now made available via the above-mentioned APIs. And since OpenAI generates revenue from usage-based fees, it is obviously incentivized to get the word out about its tech.  

One way in which it does that is to simply make its products available for free to the public. Point in case: ChatGPT, which is a refined version of GPT-3, reached one million users within five days of launching.

It also sparked a heated debate about the present (e.g., student cheating on tests) and future (e.g., unemployment) implications of AI. In any case, whether it’s good or bad publicity, the release accomplished what it was supposed to do: raise awareness for its GPT technology.

Similarly, OpenAI’s Dall-E can be accessed at no cost if you’re using the tool on a personal account. It also has a virality effect baked into it, namely via the images that users generate as well as the debates it sparks with regard to copyright and who’s the owner of the images that are being created.

Interestingly, OpenAI has also contemplated monetizing ChatGPT itself. Usage would likely be determined by a token-based system, too.

The heightened interest is just one of the reasons why OpenAI makes its products available to the public. Another huge aspect is its ability to fundraise at more favorable terms, which extends the firm’s runway substantially.

And top AI scientists certainly don’t come cheap. Ilya Sutskever, one of OpenAI’s co-founders, took home $1.9 million in 2016 alone. However, OpenAI was still operating as a non-profit and could thus not compensate its staff via shares and thus had to resort to cash-only offers.

Thirdly, it also helps to improve the performance of its models. GPT utilizes reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to improve the model’s outputs. Users, for example, can upvote or downvote a ChatGPT response, which then acts as an additional training data set.

Consequently, the more potent its models become, the greater the incentive for both business customers and consumers to use its products.

The added word-of-mouth, model improvements, and thus greater revenue are also the basis for why OpenAI invests in other startups.

One generally overlooked aspect is that OpenAI does not allow its customers to export their finetuned models (since they sit directly on top of trained models like GPT-3), meaning it creates almost inescapable lock-in effects.

OpenAI is thus engaged in a symbiotic relationship with the startups it backs. In other words, the more those startups grow, the more compute demands they have, thus leading to greater spending on the OpenAI platform.

In that regard, the partnership with Microsoft allows the firm to not only incur millions of dollars in losses per day but also access the necessary computing power to train and improve its models.

Going forward, I would assume that OpenAI continues to double down on expanding its product ecosystem, either by adding new models or improving existing ones. GPT-4, for example, is set to launch in 2023 and is allegedly 100x more powerful than its predecessor.  

The real ballsy move for OpenAI would be to acquire platforms that are known for harvesting image or text data. For example, a potential purchase of Quora, which is currently valued at $1.8 billion, would give it access to billions of posts that could serve as inputs to its language models.

OpenAI Funding, Revenue & Valuation

OpenAI, according to Crunchbase, has more than $1 billion across six rounds of venture capital funding.

Most of that money came from Microsoft, which invested $1 billion into OpenAI back in July 2019. Other notable investors include Sequoia Capital, Tiger Global Management, and Andreessen Horowitz.

OpenAI is currently valued at $20 billion after many of the above-mentioned investors deployed an undisclosed sum of money into the business back in 2021.

The firm’s revenue figures are currently not being disclosed. However, OpenAI, in recent pitches to investors, has stated that it expects to generate $200 million in revenue during the fiscal year 2023. That number is set to increase to $1 billion in 2024.

Why 2023 will be a tough year for TUSEN – Treasury CS

 

Finance Minister Prof. Njuguna Ndung’u warned TUSEN on Wednesday, January 12, to brace themselves for tough economic times in 2023.

The CS revealed that the country’s financial levels had risen to unimaginable levels.

Njuguna spoke at the public hearing about the budget process that brought together stakeholders from different sectors, including representatives from the Nairobi executive and legislature.

“Out of all the things we’ve analysed, the outlook for 2023 doesn’t look very good, there are clear signs that it’s going to be a tough year,” Njuguna said.

 

Treasury CS Njuguna Ndung’u will chair a bilateral Czech Republic-Kenya cooperation meeting at the Treasury Building, Nairobi County on Wednesday, January 11, 2023.

Facebook

Treasury

Njuguna’s comments came at a time when TUSEN are experiencing tough economic times with skyrocketing energy and food costs amid high inflation.

Over the past two years, the economy has been hit hard by the lingering fallout from the pandemic and the war in Ukraine, events that devastated global markets, as evidenced by skyrocketing oil and food prices.

“Multiple factors are likely to come into play and affect growth prospects around the world,

For example, if the conflict between Russia and Ukraine continues to escalate, global supply chains will continue to be affected, leading to supply disruptions and a sharp rise in inflation…” Njuguna added.

The Treasury CS further revealed that supply disruptions and high levels of inequality and poverty were factors that would continue to hit TUSEN hard.

“We have seen here in Kenya that food security and climate change have led to serious crises, exacerbated by these supply disruptions, inequality, poverty and social conflict,” he noted.

The Ministry of Finance also lamented the waste of resources by various government departments and called for strict austerity measures to manage the state treasury.

“We don’t want you to start new projects before starting new ones.

We don’t want to waste resources, we have unused equipment on site, there are loans we need to look into,” directed PS Treasury Chris Kiptoo.

A report released by the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) in December 2022 indicates that inflation relative to the consumer price index has fallen from 9.4 in November to 9.1 in December.

Inflation in December was driven by the increase in the prices of food and non-alcoholic beverages, transport, housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels, according to the KNBS.